Doctors want to be doctors.
Providers do not want to change workflow for QPP
reports; they want to help people.
It's common knowledge that generating QPP
submissions can be a major distraction.
It's time for a systemized QPP solution that
- Maximizes CMS incentives and minimizes penalties
- Provides an accurate QPP reporting process
- Minimizes interruptions to providers with automated report
functions
- Automates the data verification, review and audit processes.
QCDR (Qualified Clinical Data Registries) aim to
fulfill all of these goals.
-------------------------------
Eliminating QPP reporting roadblocks require the
following considerations:
- Leverage existing relationships - Most
providers already have a reporting process already in place that
involves EHRs, billing agencies and associations. Coordinating
these relationships can save all involved parties much time and effort.
- Extend the utility of existing electronic
records. Healthcare providers are busy; there is an absolute
need to minimize any additional record keeping.
- Reduce the need for additional technology:
Technology can be expensive and time consuming. There are
information pathways that minimize the QPP requirements placed on the
provider. Other entities can be more effective at IT management.
-------------------------
Reporting options
There are many CMS QPP
reporting options. Here's a brief roadmap:
- Claims - Bookkeeping / billing is
extended to facilitate QPP reporting
Disadvantages:
- CMS intends to stop
offering this option in the near future.
- Tedious, extensive
record keeping
- Erroneous record
keeping will cancel any benefits and cause penalties.
- Registry - An viable option for providers
with EHR's;
Disadvantages:
- Requires
extensive provider time to review charts.
- Requires
expensive registry consultants
- Those without
EHR's must realistically look for another option
- DSV - A viable option for providers with
Meaningful Use (MU) level 2 EHR's;
Disadvantages:
- Can require
expensive EHR upgrades to achieve MU 2
- Requires IT
support to manage process (generally used by large providers).
- Those without
EHR's must realistically look for another option
- QCDR - Qualified Clinical Data Registry -
- A viable option that reduces IT
support requirements for providers (i.e. no EHR)
- QCDR can use existing
electronic reporting infrastructure, such as billing entities
- QCDR can implement custom
performance metrics of professional associations
- QCDR can implement any
standard quality metrics (NQF) to achieve CMS compliance
Disadvantages:
- Planning stages
required
Schedule, measure definitions, IT infrastructure, organizational
delegation
- Requires QCDR IT
support to provide timely,accurate electronic CMS reporting
Continue to assessment
evaluations:
|